Well, good afternoon, friends. With this entry I begin my own change in strategy. I have another blog, which is devoted to matters of my interest in U.S. foreign policy, the war against Islamist terrorism, and various other subjects involving the law, both international and U.S. constitutional matters. I'll link to articles from that blog from time to time, but not right now.
I have chosen to reignite this particular blog along the lines which were at the core of small organization which Gail and I began 10 years ago: our interest in spirituality, particularly Christian spirituality. I choose not to let it be a religious blog, turning it into a walking advertisement for churches and mere traditional dogma. But I am going to make it a discussion place about God, His existence, and our relationship to Him as human beings, who I am convinced are made by God, in His image and His likeness, in spite of our flaws and failings, better known as "sin."
I will talk about different matters that impact upon my conviction of the ultimate reasonableness and exclusive sensibility in believing in Jesus as the true and unique expression of God in the universe, as well as what I hope are common-sense applications of faith in Him and His teachings in the everyday world. I hope to be non-boring, especially as I begin posting podcast and video from different sources.
So I'll begin now. Earlier today I noted about four different articles from two esteemed centers of thought and learning that deal with the scientific soundness of believing that the Bible's account of the creation of the universe is literally true:
The Institute for Creation Research, and
Answers in Genesis (ICR is near my home in San Diego, CA, and AIG is located in Georgetown, Kentucky, just south of Cincinnati, Ohio). The first of two articles just released by ICR and posted on its website dealt with the issue of explanations from the fossil record in various places around the world, which support the Genesis account of a great global flood about 5,000 years ago (rather than millions or billions of years ago).
"Vulgar Notions of A Universal Flood" pins the dearth of support for the universal nature of the fossil deposits, coming at approximately the same time, squarely upon a truly-ironic religious fanaticism on the part of evolutionary scientists, failing to account for the variable of eruption of land tectonic plate formations and water displacement. Such explains how there could be a vast amount of water which covered the highest mountains which were then displaced within a year into the world's ocean basins, which are deeper than the mountain ranges are high.
"Smithsonian: Religious Scientists Prohibited", is an expose of how the National Museum of Natural History sought to ban and eventually fire Dr. Richard Sternberg, a distinguished fellow of the Smithsonian, simply for publishing a journal article by an Oxford professor who posited the possibility of Intelligent Design as a suitable explanation for certain biological processes. Though an evolutionist himself, the Smithsonian's fellows, including his own peers, sought to have Dr. Sternberg fired. It took a U.S. Congressional investigation to save Dr. Sternberg's position as even being on the staff of the Smithsonian, and after suffering demotion and harassment.
In
AIG, the first article contained
an insightful attack on the notion of mutation being a satisfactory explanation for E coli bacteria's resiliency as a pathogen infecting food produce, rather than being a genetically-equipped substance that engages in non-mutated adaptation, which explains the higher amount of genetic information that the organism has obtained in order to change and thrive. Rejecting mutation in this case is further evidentiary support for divine design as a cause for the development and increased complexity of living things rather than by untenable evolutionary processes.
The second article contained an expose of
high-handed moves by the University of California system (including UC-Berkeley, UCLA, and of course, our own UC-San Diego) to ban admission of Christian high school and home school graduates who used creationist science textbooks as part of their science curriculum. The textbooks had the same discussion of science history and the teaching of the scientific method, one just had a belief in creationism reflected and the UC system couldn't handle even scriptures written at the start of each unit in the Christian science textbooks. The bigotry is simply beyond the pale, and deserves the massive legal action lodged by the Christian schools and parents.
I simply am amazed at the capability of people to claim absolute impartiality and yet treat people who disagree with them, particularly in the science field, with that kind of bigotry.
Well, we'll be back for more tomorrow. If you don't like or recognize the links to the articles, just do a Google search to ICR and AIG.
---Cincinnatus---